Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

by MajorHoy Sun Jun 17, 2018 1:02 am

CHARLIE'S ANGELS #1
The Angels are back, baby! -The original Angels, Jill, Kelly and Sabrina! Travel back to the swingin' 70s, and revisit the butt-kicking, crime-fighting, mold-breaking lady detectives who took 70s TV by storm, ready to do the same to comics 40 years later! Break out your bell-bottoms, feather your hair, and jump back to a era of peanut-farmer presidents, gargantuan gas-guzzlers and foxy female detectives... for a globe-trotting adventure that's simply too big and epic for the 70s-era boob tube. Written by elderly Eisner winner and solicitation-writing former-superstar John Layman, and with art by his scrappy but lovable youngster pal, Joe Eisma. This is one comic you DON'T DARE TO MISS!!!!
Writer: John Layman
Art: Joe Eisma
Cover A: David Finch, Jimmy Reyes
Cover B: Joe Eisma
Cover C: Joe Eisma "Character Design" Cover
(U.S.) cover Price: $3.99

https://www.dynamite.com/htmlfiles/viewProduct.html?PRO=C72513026736801011
NOTE: This was originally due out for June 6th, but is currently listed for June 27th.

by **tony ingram** Sun Jun 17, 2018 12:20 pm

Interesting! That's what I like about Dynamite, they have a knack for pushing all my nostalgia buttons. Smile

by Lucy Ingram Sat Jun 23, 2018 12:36 pm

Is it just me, or is nostalgia bigger in this decade than it's ever been before?

by **tony ingram** Sat Jun 23, 2018 1:41 pm

Lucy McGough wrote:Is it just me, or is nostalgia bigger in this decade than it's ever been before?

Nostalgia is always more popular when the real world is awful.

by Lucy Ingram Sat Jun 23, 2018 2:23 pm

This is true Sad

by MajorHoy Mon Jun 25, 2018 12:38 am

Lucy McGough wrote:Is it just me, or is nostalgia bigger in this decade than it's ever been before?

I think it's just you / your age.
It seemed like nostalgia was just as "big" for other periods/times in the past as well.
(For example, I seem to remember a big disco music resurgence back in the early 1990s.)

by Mbast1 Mon Jun 25, 2018 9:03 pm

tony ingram wrote:Nostalgia is always more popular when the real world is awful.

I think that's probably the best answer.

by MajorHoy Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:31 pm

Issue #2:

CHARLIE'S ANGELS #2
When it comes to secrets and spies, who can you trust? No, seriously. We're asking you. The Angels need to know. They are after a KGB agent in possession of American nuclear information and things are not what they seem. It looks like they will have to use their brains and karate action to get themselves out of this one!
Writer: John Layman
Art: Joe Eisma
Cover A: Stephane Roux
Cover B: Joe Eisma
(U.S.) cover Price: $3.99

https://www.dynamite.com/htmlfiles/viewProduct.html?PRO=C72513026736802011
NOTE: This was originally listed with an ON SALE DATE: 7/4/2018, but is reportedly shipping July 18th.

As for the part of the solicitation that says "It looks like they will have to use their brains and karate action to get themselves out of this one!", good thing we're not talking about Julie Rogers (played by Tanya Roberts in Season 5)! Razz

Charlie's Angels from Dynamite Tanya+and+cheryl

by **tony ingram** Mon Jul 09, 2018 9:32 pm

I got a little confused there for a minute, since I read 7/4/2018 as 7th April and wondered why it was over three months late. Then I remembered Americans have that weird date thing where the month comes first... Embarassed

by MajorHoy Tue Jul 10, 2018 12:13 am

tony ingram wrote:I got a little confused there for a minute, since I read 7/4/2018 as 7th April and wondered why it was over three months late. Then I remembered Americans have that weird date thing where the month comes first...

But then again, would you be more likely to say "July 9th" or "9th July" when you're talking to somebody?

by Mbast1 Tue Jul 10, 2018 12:21 am

MajorHoy wrote:But then again, would you be more likely to say "July 9th" or "9th July" when you're talking to somebody?

I've heard more than one British show where they say it "9th July".

by **tony ingram** Tue Jul 10, 2018 6:55 am

MajorHoy wrote:
tony ingram wrote:I got a little confused there for a minute, since I read 7/4/2018 as 7th April and wondered why it was over three months late. Then I remembered Americans have that weird date thing where the month comes first...
But then again, would you be more likely to say "July 9th" or "9th July" when you're talking to somebody?

I would say "the ninth of July", obviously. Because it would be the ninth of July. I doubt many Britons, at least of my generation, would say "July ninth".

by **tony ingram** Tue Jul 10, 2018 6:56 am

Mbast1 wrote:
MajorHoy wrote:But then again, would you be more likely to say "July 9th" or "9th July" when you're talking to somebody?

I've heard more than one British show where they say it "9th July".

Yes. Because we know how to speak English.

by Mbast1 Wed Jul 11, 2018 7:41 pm

tony ingram wrote:Yes. Because we know how to speak English.

As an American I want to argue with that. But, HOW?!?

by **tony ingram** Wed Jul 11, 2018 8:13 pm

Mbast1 wrote:
tony ingram wrote:Yes. Because we know how to speak English.

As an American I want to argue with that. But, HOW?!?

by Lucy Ingram Sat Jul 14, 2018 11:26 am

I'd say either "the ninth of July" or "July the ninth."

by Sponsored content

Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

Re: Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

Re: Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

Re: Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

Re: Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

Re: Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

Re: Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

Re: Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

Re: Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

Re: Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

Re: Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

Re: Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

Re: Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

Re: Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

Re: Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

Re: Charlie's Angels from Dynamite

Re: Charlie's Angels from Dynamite